Prediction of Mary Lou Piatek vs Ginger Helgeson Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
M. Lou Piatek vs G. Helgeson

Mary Lou Piatek

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Ginger Helgeson

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Piatek 1 - 0 Helgeson

They have played 2 sets in total, with Mary Lou Piatek winning 2 and Ginger Helgeson winning 0. The last match between Mary Lou Piatek and Ginger Helgeson was at the Hilton Head, 30-03-1992, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Mary Lou Piatek getting the victory 6-1 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Piatek	1
Helgeson	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R2) Hilton Head(03-30-92)

Stats

Mary Lou Piatek

Ginger Helgeson

M. L. Piatek vs G. Helgeson H2H Profile

M. L. Piatek	Stats	G. Helgeson
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
46.80% (212-241)	Career Total W/L	56.77% (151-115)
1	Clay	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

M. L. Piatek vs G. Helgeson Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mary Lou Piatek has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Ginger Helgeson has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mary Lou Piatek, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ginger Helgeson has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Mary Lou Piatek has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ginger Helgeson has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Mary Lou Piatek has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Ginger Helgeson winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Mary Lou Piatek has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 104/88), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 31% (W/L 16/36). Ginger Helgeson has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 79/51), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 7/7).
Player level: In the last year, Mary Lou Piatek has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Ginger Helgeson has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mary Lou Piatek winning 1 times and Ginger Helgeson being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Mary Lou Piatek winning 2 and Ginger Helgeson winning 0.
The last match between Mary Lou Piatek and Ginger Helgeson was at the Hilton Head, 30-03-1992, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Mary Lou Piatek getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mary Lou Piatek has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Ginger Helgeson has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mary Lou Piatek has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ginger Helgeson has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Mary Lou Piatek has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ginger Helgeson has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Mary Lou Piatek vs Ginger Helgeson Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. L. Piatek vs G. Helgeson H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

M. L. Piatek	Stats	G. Helgeson
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	5
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

M. L. Piatek Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Chicago - 06-02-1995
Q2 Maria Vento KabchiM. Vento	L	6-0 7-5	Stats
Q1 Danielle ScottD. Scott	W	7-6 6-2	Stats
Key Biscayne - 11-03-1994
Q1 Nana SmithN. Smith	L	6-3 7-5	Stats
Delray Beach - 28-02-1994
Q1 Silvija TalajaS. Talaja	L	6-2 6-3	Stats
Oklahoma - 14-02-1994
Q2 Nicole LondonN. London	L	7-5 5-7 6-3	Stats

View All

G. Helgeson Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
El Paso 10K - 27-05-1996
R3 Kristine KurthK. Kurth	W	6-3 7-6 6-1	Stats
Martina NejedlyM. Nejedly	L	4-2 RET	Stats
R4 Violette AhnV. Ahn	W	6-7 7-6 6-2	Stats
Amelia Island - 08-04-1996
R2 Lea GhirardiL. Ghirardi	L	7-6 6-1	Stats
Key Biscayne - 21-03-1996
R1 Claudia PorwikC. Porwik	L	6-4 6-0	Stats

View All

M. L. Piatek vs G. Helgeson Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

M. L. Piatek	Stats	G. Helgeson
46.80% (212/241)	YTD Win/Loss	56.77% (151/115)
47.16% (482/540)	Sets Win/Loss	56.03% (339/266)
48.92% (4511/4710)	Games Win/Loss	53.03% (2914/2581)
54.17% (104/88)	Hard Win/Loss	60.77% (79/51)
32.56% (14/29)	Clay Win/Loss	56.00% (42/33)
49.29% (69/71)	Indoor Hard W/L	43.75% (7/9)
34.62% (9/17)	Grass Win/Loss	50.00% (7/7)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
349.03	Average Opponent Rank	322.56
16.67% (1/5)	Slam W/L	52.94% (9/8)
42.86% (6/8)	Challenger W/L	60.47% (26/17)
30.77% (16/36)	Futures W/L	51.61% (16/15)
47% (209/448)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	57% (149/262)
0% (0/0)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	100% (1/1)
53% (10/19)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	56% (10/18)
50% (62/125)	Deciding Set Win %	51% (39/77)
84% (212/178)	1st Set Won, Won Match	85% (148/126)
16% (212/34)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	15% (148/22)
14% (237/32)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	21% (116/24)